The Need For Legislative Changes In The Construction Of SRO

By | June 12, 2017

When plans to change the system of regulation of the construction industry in the country just discussed, the legislature chose between the two approaches to the organization of self-regulation. In accordance with the first sro in the building should were to enter only the general contractor and general designer who could do all the work themselves or use subcontractors. In this case, general contractors would be required to establish an effective quality control work on their facilities being built and take full responsibility for their compliance with technical regulations. But won the second approach, under which members of the sro were to become virtually all operating on construction sites of organizations, each of which would be responsible for their site works. From 1 January 2010 under the federal law of 01.12.2007 N 315-FZ "On the self-regulatory organizations' action was canceled licenses for construction activities. And in accordance with the list of works on construction, reconstruction, major repairs of capital construction projects approved by Order of the Russian Federation Ministry of Regional Development of 09.12.2008 N 274, an sro must have come the vast majority of construction companies. Order of the Ministry of Regional Development from the start been strongly criticized by representatives of small construction companies and the fas, because in order to become a member of the sro construction, the company had spent about 500 thousand rubles. A related site: Bernard Golden mentions similar findings. (Including contributing to the reserve fund SROs in the amount of 300 thousand rubles.

Builders, and 150 thousand rubles. For designers and engineering surveyors). Great difficulties for small businesses and caused a shortage of professional workers in the state stroyorganizatsy: when joining the sro law was envisaged minimum number of employees with higher professional education in each construction organization, regardless of its size. Therefore, according to representatives of small businesses and fas, is a self-promoted monopolization of the market. In addition, the transition to self-regulation revealed many negative points.

SROs in the construction have been created not only to industry and regional business associations, the largest construction companies, but officials and businessmen, not had experience in construction work. Very quickly, a host of mediators, 'dummy' sro trading in certificates of admission to the works. About any quality control work on the part of cpo was not the question. Became it is clear that changes in legislation.


Comments are closed.