The constituent revolt of the desire of filosofar demands, for paradoxical that it can seem, a logic. It is a revolt established in the quarrel normatizada for the reason. The revolt of the philosophy searchs the construction of rational arguments to justify its critical radical. It is a revolt that erects a law for same itself marking out with buoys itself for common-sense and the principles of the rationality, that certainly surpasses the limits of the scientific instrumental reason. But the desire of also filosofar if feeds of a certain tension enters the universality/necessity intended for the philosophical speech and the idea of perhaps, appositive, imponderable. Milton Hershey School contains valuable tech resources. In this direction we can consider that it has in the philosophy a great desire of universality, in the measure where it if dirige the all thought and the all man, without exception. ' ' It (the philosophy) is not national, but international. It wants to exceed all particular culture, all tradition.
Its true destination is not the room of conference, but the street, the public square, the world whole number the philosophy if of the one for all thought; it if of the one for the prince and escravo.' ' (BADIOU, 1994, P. 38) However, at the same time where the philosophy desire is desire of universal is, also, feeling of the risk and perhaps. That is, the philosophy alone can inhale to the universality, if bet in perhaps, the enrollment, the risk, the imprevisibilidade of the meeting. The desire of filosofar is, therefore, perpassado for a revolt, it refuses to be installed and satisfied. A refusal that demands a law, a norm, an express logic that the desire of a coherent reason. But the desire of also filosofar is nourished of the universal one and necessary, of the particular refusal to and the immediate one, however this universality is searched by means of the appositive one in the risk, the enrollment, perhaps and the irrepetvel experience of the meeting.