… They form a sequential art, an emblematic projection of the life, an analogous appearance of the type common experience that if always bases on the social facts … flowing through the times. Speaking candidly baby clothes told us the story. Hollander defined clearly a point of view on a secular context, where the fashion and the art had been born of a social context and its concepts go moving during time. However other authors consider the fashion and the art as being simply expression forms human being, and that the fashion takes the function of artistic instrument. Another proposal is of Souza (1996, p.40-41), mentioning it question of the movement in fashion: … while the picture alone can be seen of front it decrees and it in always offers its stopped face to them, the clothes not only lives in the fullness of the coloring, but of the movement …, recompondo it each moment, playing with the unexpected one, depending on the gesture, is the most alive fashion, more the human being of the arts. In this perspective, Souza brings the quarrel the question of the movement, almost that making a relation to the performance concept, that will be studied ahead, as being essential part for the humanizao of the art.
Being thus the fashion he receives the value to give to life the work of art and to become it something that interacts with the citizen uses that it. 3.2.O ARTIST AND the FASHION the clothes is of its daily use can receive some adjectives, however something cannot be considered as insignificant or mere innocent, therefore never he will be alone, bringing I obtain, objectives to be reached. According to times and its interpreter – artist or estilista- will be in such a way the expression of an idea how much the critical one of a society. (MLLER, 2000) In this period, the artists most significant, are against the continuity of forms of the past, rejecting the cult of the perpetual beauty and the art of museum running away from artistic rules.