Executive Council

By | December 21, 2014

Research Editor, all constitutional complaints have been spotted online since 1998, however, is the fact that just the constitutional complaint 1 BvR 3282/08 is not searchable and strangely woman Dr.Barnstedt allegedly sent writing from 07.01.2009 the complainant in the judicial order (which judge also may have made this order), which stands alone against the BVerfGG, there be a decision on a complaint must. There is also the curiosity and inconsistency, that could be received after submission of their application the appellant of the allegedly not justified and rejected constitutional complaints by the Executive Council or the Executive Councillor that her constitutional complaint be obviously inadmissible or unfounded. This audacious “trick” the Federal Constitutional Court or more specifically people who pass themselves off as constitutional judge applies, as in 24 BVerfGG: inadmissible and manifestly unfounded cases can be discarded by a unanimous decision of the Court. The decision requires no justification, if the applicant has previously been informed concerns the admissibility or merits of the application for (so over 4000 times since 1998 due to work load and discharge of the Court). Furthermore, unusual is that all rejected constitutional complaints without grounds should be been decided unanimously. Already ten times, the Federal Constitutional Court Act was amended with effect from November 23, 2007. There was the first amendment (Cleanup) the original version of the 11.08.1993 on the 16.07.1998, which among other things, section 23 was affected BVerfGG. In any sighted judgment or decision amending the Constitutional Act has been, cited even begin what could be due to that over 4000 constitutional complaints “from Work relief”no judicial control may be inferior and were decided only by the Presidential Council, are therefore invalid, if the complainant has requested a judicial decision. Could be a violation of the resulting also, against article 90 BVerfGG exists, because anyone with the assertion by the public authorities in one of his basic rights or one its can raise the constitutional complaint 20 IV, 33, 38, 101, 103, and 104 GG contained rights to be violated in articles to the Federal Constitutional Court.


Comments are closed.